Henry Makow..Ph.D
Salam.. hari ini saya bertemu dengan Henry Makow, di atas.. percaya tak?? huhu. tak la..saya menjumpai satu artikel beliau di internet.. lalu saya membacanya dan tertarik mengenai artikel berkenaan. Beliau dilahrikan di Switzerland pada 12 nov 1949 dan menetap di Ottawa, Kanada. Merupakan seorang penulis, pengkaji teori2 konspirasi dan aktif dalam programe Scruples. Mendapat Ph.D di universiti Toronto pada 1992. (wikipedia).
erm.. tulisan beliau tentang Bikini Vs Burka : The Debauchery of Women .. telah menunjukkan terdapat juga para cerdik pandai europah yang melihat Burka dari sudut positif dan mengkritik pemakaian seksi seperti bikini di kalangan masyarakat America. Artikel tersebut ditulis respon mengenai peperangan yang berlaku di afganistan.
dari sudut positif, beliau melihat pemakaian burka bagi wanita sebenarnya bersifat privasi hanya untuk suami dan ahli keluarga mereka sahaja. ini kerana wanita peranan utamanya adalah di rumah. Wanita sebagai isteri yang mendokong suami, melahirkan, ,mendidik dan membesarkan anak-anak. Itulah fungsi dan peranan wanita secara fitrahnya.
Berlainan dengan keadaan wanita America yang bebas menonjolkan diri mereka di khalayak ramai. meng'expose' diri mereka dengan berpakaian seksi dan bebas itu hanya untuk menarik perhatian umum dan disukai ramai. Mereka adalah hanya diri mereka dan milik semua orang. Pergaulan bebas dan seks menjadi amalan sebelum mereka mengikat tali perkahwinan. Menurut Henry Makow pergaulan bebas wanita seperti ini la yang dimahukan oleh Amerika untuk melaksanakan rancangan New World Order. Semestinya ini akan merosakkan wanita yang sepatutnya menjadi pendidik anak2.
burka..
yang satu: jelas la haram dalam Islam.. yang lagi satu: tutup semua..
walaubagaimana pun, beliau berpendapat kedua2nya iaitu berbikini dan burka adalah ekstrem, maka yang seeloknya adalah pertengahan..
di bawah ini saya bawakan artikel asal beliau: baca dan lebih faham~ :)
By Henry Makow Ph.D.
On my wall, I have a picture of a Muslim woman shrouded in a burka.
Beside it is a picture of an American beauty contestant, wearing nothing but a bikini.
One woman is totally hidden from the public; the other is totally exposed. These two extremes say a great deal about the clash of so-called "civilizations."
The role of woman is at the heart of any culture. Apart from stealing Arab oil, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are about stripping Muslims of their religion and culture, exchanging the burka for a bikini.
I am not an expert on the condition of Muslim women and I love feminine beauty too much to advocate the burka here. But I am defending some of the values that the burka represents for me.
For me, the burka represents a woman's consecration to her husband and family. Only they see her.It affirms the privacy, exclusivity and importance of the domestic sphere.
The Muslim woman's focus is her home, the "nest" where her children are born and reared. She is the "home" maker, the taproot that sustains the spiritual life of the family, nurturing and training her children, providing refuge and support to her husband.
In contrast, the bikinied American beauty queen struts practically naked in front of millions on TV. A feminist, she belongs to herself. In practice, paradoxically, she is public property. She belongs to no one and everyone. She shops her body to the highest bidder. She is auctioning herself all of the time.
In America, the cultural measure of a woman's value is her sex appeal. (As this asset depreciates quickly, she is neurotically obsessed with appearance and plagued by weight problems.)
As an adolescent, her role model is Britney Spears, a singer whose act approximates a strip tease. From Britney, she learns that she will be loved only if she gives sex. Thus, she learns to "hook up" furtively rather than to demand patient courtship, love and marriage. As a result, dozens of males know her before her husband does. She loses her innocence, which is a part of her charm. She becomes hardened and calculating. Unable to love, she is unfit to receive her husband's seed.
The feminine personality is founded on the emotional relationship between mother and baby. It is based on nurturing and self-sacrifice. Masculine nature is founded on the relationship between hunter and prey. It is based on aggression and reason.
Feminism deceives women to believe femininity has resulted in "oppression" and they should adopt male behavior instead. The result: a confused and aggressive woman with a large chip on her shoulder, unfit to become a wife or mother.
This is the goal of the NWO social engineers: undermine sexual identity and destroy the family, create social and personal dysfunction, and
reduce population. In the "brave new world," women are not supposed to be mothers and progenitors of the race. They are meant to be neutered, autonomous sex objects.
Liberating women is often given as an excuse for the war in Afghanistan. Liberating them to what? To Britney Spears? To low-rise "see-my-thong" pants? To the mutual masturbation that passes for sexuality in America? If they really cared about women, maybe they'd end the war.
Parenthood is the pinnacle of human development. It is the stage when we finally graduate from self-indulgence and become God's surrogates: creating and nurturing new life. The New World Order does not want us to reach this level of maturity. Pornography is the substitute for marriage. We are to remain single: stunted, sex-starved and self-obsessed.
We are not meant to have a permanent "private" life. We are meant to remain lonely and isolated, in a state of perpetual courtship, dependent on consumer products for our identity.
This is especially destructive for woman. Her sexual attraction is a function of her fertility. As fertility declines, so does her sex appeal. If a woman devotes her prime years to becoming "independent," she is not likely to find a permanent mate.
Her long-term personal fulfillment and happiness lies in making marriage and family her first priority.
Feminism is another cruel New World Order hoax that has debauched American women and despoiled Western civilization. It has ruined millions of lives and represents a lethal threat to Islam.
I am not advocating the burka but rather some of the values that it represents, specifically a woman's consecration to her future husband and family, and the modesty and dignity this entails.
The burka and the bikini represent two extremes. The answer lies somewhere in the middle.
oleh itu, marila kita renung firman Allah Swt yang bermaksud:
"Katakanlah kepada wanita-wanita yang beriman, hendaklah mereka menahan pandangan mereka (jangan melihat lelaki janabi) dan memelihara kemaluan mereka (tidak berzina) dan janganlah mereka menampakkan perhiasan mereka kecuali apa yang biasa nampak padanya. Hendaklah mereka menutup (aurat mereka) dengan JILBAB hinggalah menutupi dada mereka dan janganlah menampakkan perhiasan mereka kecuali kepada suami mereka atau ayah mereka, atau ayah suami mereka, atau anak lelaki mereka, atau anak lelaki suami mereka, atau saudara lelaki mereka, atau anak saudara lelaki saudara lelaki, mereka atau anak lelaki saudara perempuan mereka, atau pelayan lelaki yang sudah tidak ada keinginan syahwat kepada wanita atau kanak-kanak lelaki yang belum mengerti tentang aurat wanita. janganlah kamu menghentakkan kaki agar diketahui (didengari) perhiasan yang mereka sembunyikan (gelang kaki). Bertaubatlah kamu sekalian kepada Allah wahai orang-orang yang beriman agar kamu beruntung"
(AnNur: ayat 31)
Imam Az Zahibi dalam Az Zawajir berkata : "Setengah fitnah yang dibuat oleh kaum wanita ialah .. mereka berpakaian yang jarang dan ketat yang menampakkan susuk tubuh mereka kepada lelaki ajnabi (bukan mahram) dengan mereka. Semuanya adalah tabarruj (solekan dan fesyen pakaian) yang dilarang dan dilaknat oleh ALLAH".
